FinOps That Doesn’t Slow You Down

Visibility → quick wins → operating cadence. We reduce run-rate with right-sizing, commitments, and guardrails — while teams keep shipping.

Signals You Might Need FinOps Help

  • High bill, low elasticity; owners can’t explain this month’s spikes
  • Tagging coverage < 70%; budgets exist but no one gets alerted
  • Idle storage/IPs/DBs linger because “someone might use it”
  • Commitments under-utilised; vendor options unclear
  • No single rhythm across cloud, hosted, and on-prem spend

What We Do (Plain Terms)

1) Make spend visible

Clean tags, owners, budgets, anomaly alerts. Unit costs by product/env so teams see the slope and act.

2) Land quick wins

Rightsize hotspots, schedule-to-zero, kill idle/orphaned resources, set storage lifecycle. Savings in days, not quarters.

3) Put guardrails in the background

Policies that enforce themselves — tagging in CI/IaC, budget alerts to owners, exception approvals, showback.

4) Tune architecture & commitments

Fix costly patterns (egress, chatty services). Buy commitments where utilisation is predictable — with guardrails.

30 Days to Visible Savings

  1. Days 1–5: Baseline run-rate, top 10 spenders, tag coverage; set budgets/alerts.
  2. Days 6–10: Rightsize & schedule top 5 clusters/VMs; storage lifecycle; remove idle/orphans.
  3. Days 11–20: Commitment plan (SP/RI/CUD) with utilisation guardrails and approvals.
  4. Days 21–30: Dashboards live; showback/chargeback; monthly cost WBR started.
Need savings this month?

We’ll land quick wins without breaking delivery.

Start the baseline & quick wins

Operating Cadence (Monthly WBR)

  • Run-rate vs budget → deltas → owners → dates
  • Anomalies and spikes → RCA → playbook action
  • Commitment coverage & utilisation → adjust plan
  • Top 5 “next best moves” per team → closed next review

Purchasing & Commitments

We target predictable baseload with Savings Plans/RI/CUDs and leave headroom for change. Guardrails ensure utilisation is tracked and no one over-commits. Vendors are aligned to measurable outcomes, not vanity discounts.

Architecture Levers That Move Cost

  • Compute: rightsizing, autoscale, spot/fleet, schedule-to-zero
  • Storage: tiering, lifecycle, compression, snapshot hygiene
  • Data transfer: placement, caching, peering, CDN; avoid accidental egress
  • Patterns: queues/caches to flatten peaks; serverless where it wins

See Cloud foundations and Hosting for venue decisions when hyperscale isn’t the best fit.

Chargeback/Showback That Teams Respect

Owners see what they spend and why. Budgets are enforced in tooling, not email. We report unit costs that map to outcomes (per order/session/model run) and keep the backlog of cost moves short and closed.

Databricks: Quick Wins Without Slowing Delivery

  • Right-size clusters & jobs; pools and autoscale with sensible bounds
  • Photon where it helps; checkpointing & caching to cut recompute
  • Job orchestration to avoid zombie runs; visibility of DBU burn by team

Deep dive: Databricks Cost — Quick Wins.

Results & Benchmarks

Run-rate reduction on steady workloads15–35% in 30–60 days
Commitment coverage with healthy utilisation≥ 70% coverage, ≥ 85% util
Tagging coverage (owner/env/product)≥ 95% in 30 days
Time to anomaly detection & triageSame-day

FAQ

Will FinOps slow teams down?

No — guardrails run in the background. We prioritise changes that don’t block delivery.

Do we need a cost tool first?

Not to begin. We start with native tooling and add a platform if/when ROI is clear.

How fast to savings?

Most clients see visible run-rate reduction within the first 30 days.